What Is A Scoping Review?

A scoping review is a type of literature review that is conducted to map out what is already known about a particular topic.

Checkout this video:

What is a scoping review?

A scoping review is a type of literature review that is conducted in order to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale systematic review on a particular topic. A scoping review is usually less comprehensive than a systematic review, and may not involve the same level of detailed analysis.

What are the benefits of a scoping review?

There are many benefits of conducting a scoping review, including:

1. Identifying the extent and range of research on a given topic
2. Clarifying the key concepts and terminology associated with a topic
3. Defining the boundaries of a research area
4. Identifying gaps in research
5. Informing future research priorities
6. Facilitating the design of future studies
7. Enhancing understanding of a topic among different stakeholders

What are the types of scoping review?

There are two main types of scoping review: traditional and rapid. A traditional scoping review follows the same methodology as a systematic review, but it is undertaken when there is little or no existing evidence in an area. This type of scoping review can be very time-consuming, as it involves conducting a comprehensive search of the literature and applying rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. A rapid scoping review is a less intensive version of a traditional scoping review, and can be undertaken when there is already some existing evidence in an area. This type of scoping review is typically used to map the landscape of existing evidence in a given area, and to identify gaps in the literature.

How is a scoping review conducted?

A scoping review is a type of literature review that is conducted in order to assess the size, range, and depth of the available evidence on a given topic. This information can then be used to help determine the focus of future research in that area.

Scoping reviews are flexible in terms of their methodology, but there are some key steps that are generally followed. First, a research question is developed and a search strategy is created in order to identify relevant literature. Next, the identified studies are assessed for quality and summarized. Finally, the findings are interpreted and reported.

While scoping reviews do not require the same level of rigor as systematic reviews, they should still be conducted in a systematic and transparent manner in order to ensure reliable results.

What are the steps involved in a scoping review?

A scoping review is a type of literature review that is conducted in order to determine the extent and nature of research on a particular topic. Researchers conducting a scoping review will identify and analyze all available studies on the topic in order to produce a comprehensive overview of what has been published.

There are generally four steps involved in conducting a scoping review:

1. Identifying the research question or questions that will guide the review.
2. Conducting a search of the literature to identify all relevant studies.
3. Screening the studies to select those that are most relevant to the research question.
4. Analyzing and synthesizing the findings of the included studies.

How long does a scoping review take?

Scoping reviews are conducted to map the key concepts and ideas in a given body of literature. They are used to gain an overview of a particular topic area, as opposed to conducting a comprehensive review of all available evidence on a topic.

Scoping reviews are usually quicker to conduct than traditional systematic reviews, as they do not require such a rigorous and in-depth search of the literature. However, the time required to complete a scoping review will depend on several factors, including the breadth and depth of the literature search, the number of reviewers involved, and the method used to extract and synthesize data.

How much does a scoping review cost?

The cost of a scoping review will depend on the scope of the project and the number of researchers involved. Generally, scoping reviews can range from $5,000 to $20,000.

What are the challenges of conducting a scoping review?

There are a number of challenges associated with conducting a scoping review which can make this type of study time-consuming and difficult to complete. In particular, it can be difficult to:

-Define the research question(s)
-Develop inclusion/exclusion criteria for studies
-Search for relevant studies
-Select studies for inclusion
-Extract data from studies
-Assess the quality of included studies
-Synthesize findings from included studies

What are the common mistakes made in scoping reviews?

Scoping reviews are an increasingly popular way of summarizing the state of the evidence on a topic, particularly in healthcare. They have a specific methodology which if followed, will ensure that the review is comprehensive and transparent. However, there are common mistakes that scoping review authors make which can lead to errors and bias in the results.

The most common mistake is failing to clearly define the purpose of the review at the outset. This can lead to reviewers searching for and inclusion of irrelevant studies, which in turn can bias the results. It is important to agree on inclusion and exclusion criteria with your team before starting the review process.

Another common mistake is not conducting a systematic search for relevant studies. This can mean that important studies are missed, leading to an incomplete understanding of the evidence on the topic. A good scoping review will include a comprehensive search strategy covering multiple databases and other sources of grey literature.

It is also important to involve stakeholders in the design and conduct of scoping reviews, as they can provide valuable insights into what is important to decision-makers. Furthermore, external peer reviewers can help to identify errors and biases in scoping reviews before they are published.

When conducting a scoping review, it is therefore essential to avoid these common mistakes in order to produce a high quality, unbiased overview of the evidence on your chosen topic

How can I improve the quality of my scoping review?

The quality of your scoping review can be improved by:

– Clearly defining your research question(s)
– Systematically searching for relevant studies
– Applying inclusion/exclusion criteria to identify which studies to include in your review
– quality assessment of the included studies
– Data extraction from the included studies
– Summarizing the findings of your review

Scroll to Top