A review paper synthesizes the current state of an area of research. It is a summary and evaluation of the research findings.
Checkout this video:
Defining a Review Paper
A review paper is a scientific journal article that summarizes the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. It is not a research paper; therefore, it does not present new research findings. Instead, it synthesizes existing research to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on the topic.
Review papers are an important part of the scientific process and are often published in academic journals. They provide scientists with an opportunity to share their expert opinion on current research and also allow for critical evaluation of current studies. Review papers can be helpful for students who are interested in learning about a particular topic but do not have the time to read all of the existing research.
When writing a review paper, it is important to keep in mind that you are not writing a research paper. Therefore, you should not include new data or findings in your paper. Instead, your goal should be to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on your topic. In order to do this, you will need to read and critically evaluate existing research studies.
When reading research studies, it is important to consider their methodological strengths and weaknesses. This will help you determine which studies are most reliable and how they can be used to contribute to your understanding of the topic. Once you have identified the most relevant studies, you can begin writing your paper.
When writing your paper, you should aim to synthesize the existing research rather than simply summarizing it. In other words, you should critically evaluate the findings of each study and draw conclusions about how they contribute to our understanding of the topic as a whole. It is also important to put the findings of each study into context by considering other factors that may be relevant (e.g., historical developments, social factors). By doing this, you will be able to provide a more comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on your topic.
Why Write a Review Paper?
There are several reasons why you might be asked to write a review paper. For one, reviewers perform an important service for the journal in which they work. By reading and evaluating submitted manuscripts, reviewers help editors decide which manuscripts are worthy of publication and which should be rejected. In addition, reviewers help authors improve their manuscripts by offering constructive criticism that can guide revisions. Finally, reviewers’ evaluations of manuscripts can help authors of those manuscripts find other journals that might be more appropriate for their work.
Tips for Writing a Review Paper
A review paper is a critical evaluation of previous research on a particular topic. It is a summary and synthesis of the research, not a description or a simple report. The purpose of writing a review paper is to help you learn about a current area of research and also learn how to communicate your ideas effectively in written form.
Here are some tips for writing a good review paper:
-Start by reading the abstracts to get an overview of the papers. Then, read the full text of each paper to get a detailed understanding.
-As you read, take note of the main points of each paper and any disagreement between authors.
-Once you have read all the papers, decide which angle you are going to take in your review. Are you going to focus on the similarities or differences between the papers? Or, are you going to evaluate each paper individually?
-Now that you have decided on your focus, start writing your paper. Begin by introducing the topic and then describe each paper in turn. Be sure to include citations as needed.
-End your review with a conclusion that summarizes your main points and provides your overall assessment of the current state of research in this area.
The Structure of a Review Paper
There are several standard sections in a review paper. The exact number and names of these sections may vary slightly, but they will typically include an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion and conclusion. Some papers may also include a recommendations or future work section.
The introduction should provide an overview of the topic under study and explain why the research is important. It should also provide an overview of the structure of the paper.
The literature review should critically evaluate the existing body of knowledge on the topic. It should discuss the strengths and weaknesses of past research and identify any gaps that need to be addressed.
The methodology section should describe how the research was conducted. This includes a description of the research design, participants, data collection methods and data analysis procedures.
The results section should present the findings of the study in a clear and concise manner. This includes both quantitative and qualitative data.
The discussion section should interpret the findings of the study in relation to existing knowledge on the topic. It should also identify any limitations of the study and suggestions for future research.
The conclusion should sum up the main findings of the paper and provide a brief assessment of their significance.
Finding Sources for Your Review Paper
The process of writing a review paper is something that most students are quite familiar with: find sources, take notes, organize those notes into an outline, write a paper, and revise and edit that paper. That’s the basic process. But what happens when you’re asked to find sources for a review paper? You might be thinking, “I’ve done this before! I just go to the library and check out some books.” But that’s not quite what your instructor has in mind.
When you’re asked to find sources for a review paper, your instructor is asking you to do two things: 1) find scholarly sources that discuss your topic in some detail and 2) read those sources critically. This can be a bit of a challenge, but it’s not impossible. Here are some tips:
-Start by talking to your instructor. He or she can give you some ideas about where to start looking for sources.
-Once you have some ideas, head to the library and talk to the librarians. They can help you find sources that are relevant to your topic.
-Use the databases available through the library website. These databases will have scholarly articles that you can use for your paper.
-Once you have found some sources, it’s time to start reading them critically. This means that you need to think about what the author is saying and whether or not it is supported by evidence.
-You also need to think about how this source fits into the bigger picture of what is already known about your topic
Evaluating Sources for Your Review Paper
When you write a review paper, your goal is to summarize, evaluate, and sometimes synthesize the research on a particular topic. In order to write a quality review, you must be able to select appropriate sources that areup-to-date, credible, and relevant. This can be a daunting task if you’re not familiar with how to evaluate sources. Here are somecriteria that can help you determine whether or not a source is appropriate for your paper:
-Currency: Is the source current? For most review papers, you will want to use sources that have been published within the last 5-10 years.
-Credibility: Is the author an expert in the field? What are their credentials?
-Relevance: Does the source pertain to your topic? How does it contribute to your understanding of the research on your topic?
Once you have determined that a source is appropriate for your paper, you will need to critically read and evaluate it. This means that you will need to think critically about what the author is saying and how they are saying it. You may also want to consider the following questions:
-What are the author’s main points?
-Do they provide evidence to support their claims?
-Is the evidence they provide convincing?
-Do they acknowledge counterarguments or alternative viewpoints?
-How does this source compare or contrast with other sources on your topic?
Synthesizing Sources for Your Review Paper
A review paper pulls together the latest ideas in a field of study and evaluates what is currently known. Review papers are written for many different purposes. Some focus on recent research, some on previously published work, and others on work in progress. Most reviews are formatted as articles, with sections devoted to specific topics, but they can also be formatted as literature reviews or book chapters.
When writing a review paper, you synthesize the work of others to show what is currently known about a topic and what needs to be done next. Your goal is not simply to summarize the literature but also to evaluate it andshow where there are gaps in our knowledge. You can use your review to point out potential new directions for research or to argue for a particular interpretation of the evidence. In either case, you need to provide a clear justification for your position.
To write a good review paper, you need to understand the field well enough that you can identify the key ideas and approaches that have been used in previous work. You also need to be familiar with the most recent work in the field so that you can evaluate it critically. The first step in writing a review paper is therefore to do your research and read as much of the relevant literature as possible. Once you have a good understanding of what has been done previously, you can start thinking about how best to synthesize this information into a coherent whole.
When writing your paper, it is important to keep two goals in mind: clarity and precision. Your paper should be clear enough that anyone could read it and understand what you are trying to say. At the same time, it should be precise enough that your readers will know exactly what points you are trying to make and how these relate to the evidence that you have presented. Achieving both of these goals can be challenging, but it is important to remember that your goal is not simply to produce a piece of writing that sounds good—it is also important that your paper is actually saying something meaningful about the topic at hand.
The following sections provide more detailed advice on how to write each section of your review paper.
Writing Your Review Paper
There are two common types of review papers. The first type is the research review. In this type of paper, you will be asked to synthesize the research that has been done on a certain topic. The second type of review paper is the literature review. In this type of paper, you will be asked to provide an overview of the literature that has been published on a certain topic.
Before you begin writing your review paper, it is important to choose a topic. Once you have chosen a topic, you will need to find sources that are relevant to your topic. Once you have found relevant sources, you will need to read and critically evaluate the sources. After you have read and evaluated the sources, you will need to write an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
The introduction of your review paper should provide background information on your topic and explain why the topic is important. The body paragraphs of your review paper should each focus on one source. In each body paragraph, you should provide an overview of the source and critically evaluate the source. The conclusion of your review paper should summarize the main points of your paper and explain how the sources that you have reviewed contribute to our understanding of your chosen topic.
Editing and Revising Your Review Paper
A review paper is not a “term paper” or book report. It is not simply a opinion piece nor an expository essay consisting solely of one’s interpretation of a text nor an overview of a particular topic. Instead, it is a critical evaluation of the research conducted by others. In addition to portraying the main findings of the literature, a review paper critically analyzes, synthesizes, and evaluates the research. This synthesis can take many forms but all require some kind of argument about what has gone before and what directions future research might fruitfully pursue. Although there really isn’t a “right” way to write one, following these guidelines may help you organize your thoughts and communicate them effectively.
(1) Start with a focus or thesis statement: Thesis statements are found in the introductions to scholarly review articles. A thesis statement makes an analytic claim about some issue or topic in the field and sets up the main argument that the rest of the paper will support by means of evidence and analysis. For example: “Scholar A’s arguments for X are compelling because…” Alternatively, your focus might be on demonstrating why Scholar B’s arguments against X are problematic.” In sum, make sure that your thesis clearly states your argument and sets up the structure for what follows.
(2) Summarize each article: In order to evaluate each article, you must first be able to understand it. So start by giving each article a quick read-through to get its main points. Then go back through and flesh out your summary for each article in greater detail, making sure that you hit all of the main points that you will need to address in your evaluation later on. You do not need to include every little detail--just those that are most relevant to your argument (and those that you will need to refer back to later!). Think about how each article relates back to your thesis as well--does it support it? complicate it? Extend it?etc.. Also consider how different articles might interact with one another--do they agree? disagree? build off one another? etc.. Organizing your summaries in this way from the start will save you time later when you are writing your actual review.
(3) Critically analyze each article: Just summarizing the articles is not enough--you also need to critically engage with them as well! This means asking questions about their methodological rigor, their theoretical underpinnings, their claims and evidence etc…and then evaluating how convincing or compelling those answers are. Remember that part of what makes a good reviewer is being able to articulate clearly why certain arguments work (or don’t work!) while also keeping in mind larger debates within the field as well as possible limitations in individual studies etc… Some specific things you might consider include:
-What methodological approach does each article use? Is it appropriate given what they are trying to study/find out?
-How well does each article operationalize its concepts? In other words, do they actually measure what they claim to be measuring?
-What kind of evidence do they use (e.g., surveys, experiments, case studies)? Is this evidence convincing/compelling? Why or why not?
-Is there anything important that they leave out? If so, why do you think this is? -What theories do they rely on (explicitly or implicitly)? Do these theories make sense given what they are trying to study/find out Its important here not just to state whether or not you think something works but also *why*--what exactly is working (or not working) about it and how does this relate back either individual articles under review or larger debates within the field more generally speaking… Be sure when writing your review that you maintain some distance from the articles themselves and critique them from an objective perspective rather than getting caught up in agreeing/disagreeing with everything thats being said . . . Ultimately, remember that reviewers play an important role within academic communities by helping readers evaluate new research critically so that they can decide for themselves whether something makes sense/is convincing or not . . .
Publishing Your Review Paper
When you have finished writing your review paper, it is time to publish it. The best way to do this is to submit it to a journal. Review papers are usually not accepted by regular journals, so you will need to submit it to a journal that specializes in reviews.
You can find a list of such journals at the website of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). Look for the “Journal Rankings” link on the left side of their home page, and then select “Review Journals” from the list of options.
When you submit your paper, be sure to include a cover letter. In the cover letter, explain that your paper is a review paper and give a brief overview of its contents. You should also include a list of keywords, so that potential reviewers can easily find papers that are relevant to their interests.